priderock
05-01 10:23 AM
Sanju: Thanks for your help. Quite useful info in this thread but it seems like most of the posters posted there are 3 year degree holders, not engineering.
I think there is a lot of confusion between the 3 year degree holders and the BTech Engineering degree holders, who admitted to the 2nd year of Engineering after completing the Diploma in the same specialized engineering category. I also had lot of trouble explaining this to my attorney.
I am also thinking to get a University letter from India that this is a 4 year engineering degree program and planning to submit the university letter and evaluation with the RFE.
Do you guys think is it a good idea to submit both or submitting the evaluation is sufficient?
sravani,
I know how painful it is to explain our situation to the Attorneys and others.
I spent countless hours going through forums and most posts are about 3 year Bsc/Bcom/BA degree with diploma from NIIT or similar institutions. I only came across three cases like ours. I talked to my attorney for an hour explaining the situation.
Send in both Trustforte evaluation and a letter from university. Although my lawyer seem to think the letter from (Indian)university does not help much and insisted on US evaluation agency equating the Degree we have (STAND ALONE) equal to US bachelor degree, I think it will help.
Did you get a chance to talk to the folks at the university and they agreed to send the letter? Did you attend the engg. at the university college or any other college under this university ?
I sent emails to AICTE and my university about the situation and I am waiting on that.
I was planning on talking to Trustforte folks as well ? How did your call go ? Did they seem understand what you have to say ?
I think there is a lot of confusion between the 3 year degree holders and the BTech Engineering degree holders, who admitted to the 2nd year of Engineering after completing the Diploma in the same specialized engineering category. I also had lot of trouble explaining this to my attorney.
I am also thinking to get a University letter from India that this is a 4 year engineering degree program and planning to submit the university letter and evaluation with the RFE.
Do you guys think is it a good idea to submit both or submitting the evaluation is sufficient?
sravani,
I know how painful it is to explain our situation to the Attorneys and others.
I spent countless hours going through forums and most posts are about 3 year Bsc/Bcom/BA degree with diploma from NIIT or similar institutions. I only came across three cases like ours. I talked to my attorney for an hour explaining the situation.
Send in both Trustforte evaluation and a letter from university. Although my lawyer seem to think the letter from (Indian)university does not help much and insisted on US evaluation agency equating the Degree we have (STAND ALONE) equal to US bachelor degree, I think it will help.
Did you get a chance to talk to the folks at the university and they agreed to send the letter? Did you attend the engg. at the university college or any other college under this university ?
I sent emails to AICTE and my university about the situation and I am waiting on that.
I was planning on talking to Trustforte folks as well ? How did your call go ? Did they seem understand what you have to say ?
wallpaper -Size Human Skeleton Hand
krishnam70
07-04 10:06 AM
smartsteve is right!
What is being seen here is an extreme irrational response, which will lead to nothing. Still if people feel that sending flowers will help they should do it (although if anybody feels this will actually change how the USCIS functions, they are either extremely naive or highly delusional)
you underestimate the power of the ways of Gandhi like the brits did at that time. We just need this momemtum to catch on and reported in the media to make some impact. We do not have the numbers like those illegals but we could protest in our own way and yet make some impact.
What is being seen here is an extreme irrational response, which will lead to nothing. Still if people feel that sending flowers will help they should do it (although if anybody feels this will actually change how the USCIS functions, they are either extremely naive or highly delusional)
you underestimate the power of the ways of Gandhi like the brits did at that time. We just need this momemtum to catch on and reported in the media to make some impact. We do not have the numbers like those illegals but we could protest in our own way and yet make some impact.
alexwi
09-22 10:29 AM
I'm told the text for some of amendments is available on THOMAS and that S.AMDT.5028 does include some hoped for provisions. That said, haven't seen it myself.
2011 topic human skull with
NYC-circuit
12-03 03:03 PM
I mailed DHS Form 7001 today, lets c if this makes any difference
more...
genius
11-29 05:55 PM
:rolleyes: Desp. praying for something to happen.n i hope the congressmen understand what this means...!!
kodak57
06-19 05:40 PM
Copy of 140 will do.
I am trying to get the info for minors. I will let you know when I get it.
Hi,
You have done a great service but we need few more questions ?
Do I need G-28 for my son 14 years & daughter 10 years or they can sign of thmselves & show they prepared their forms themselves.
Original I-140 is to be sent or a copy will do
How do you attach phoographs ? staple on the top of each form ?
I am trying to get the info for minors. I will let you know when I get it.
Hi,
You have done a great service but we need few more questions ?
Do I need G-28 for my son 14 years & daughter 10 years or they can sign of thmselves & show they prepared their forms themselves.
Original I-140 is to be sent or a copy will do
How do you attach phoographs ? staple on the top of each form ?
more...
qplearn
12-12 08:56 PM
Those numberusa people donot want any reform at all..The only reform they want is abolishing all immigration...Donot even think of getting into the trap of talking to those people...
Let the CIR or SKIL bill come up as a consolidated bill in late winter as the other lawmakers were discussing...We have to keep making efforts so that the bill would come up...Remember senate was never the problem...Now with democratic house it might become easier to push the CIR /SKIL through...
Talking to the anti immigration folks is a counter productive idea....
First of all, with a democratic house, it is not AT ALL easy to get the CIR passed. Don't believe anyone who says that. That has been contradicted in every leading newspaper editorial. The new Dems are conservative. Plus they are afraid of the backlash in 2008. And a big sign of that is: Pelosi is silent on CIR. It is not coming up soon. If it were that easy, it would be the first thing they would have brought up. In fact, Pelosi even met the President immediately after it became clear that she was going to the majority leader. But it still did not come up. Isn't it obvious?
Talking to anti-immigration is counter-productive? Well then why did we call Sessions?
Believe me, I will be most relieved if CIR solves our problems and if it goes successfully when it is taken up --- most probably by 07/07. After all I need is a GC that is all. I don't care for ideology at this point.
Let the CIR or SKIL bill come up as a consolidated bill in late winter as the other lawmakers were discussing...We have to keep making efforts so that the bill would come up...Remember senate was never the problem...Now with democratic house it might become easier to push the CIR /SKIL through...
Talking to the anti immigration folks is a counter productive idea....
First of all, with a democratic house, it is not AT ALL easy to get the CIR passed. Don't believe anyone who says that. That has been contradicted in every leading newspaper editorial. The new Dems are conservative. Plus they are afraid of the backlash in 2008. And a big sign of that is: Pelosi is silent on CIR. It is not coming up soon. If it were that easy, it would be the first thing they would have brought up. In fact, Pelosi even met the President immediately after it became clear that she was going to the majority leader. But it still did not come up. Isn't it obvious?
Talking to anti-immigration is counter-productive? Well then why did we call Sessions?
Believe me, I will be most relieved if CIR solves our problems and if it goes successfully when it is taken up --- most probably by 07/07. After all I need is a GC that is all. I don't care for ideology at this point.
2010 Diseño web Malaga labelled human appendicular skeleton image diagram home
indio0617
01-11 02:28 PM
My labor was applied from Wisconsin in Nov, 2001, EB2 Non-RIR.
I have not even received the 45 day letter yet.
Anyone on the same boat???:(
indyyy:
I feel for you. I know plenty with similar PDs....
I have not even received the 45 day letter yet.
Anyone on the same boat???:(
indyyy:
I feel for you. I know plenty with similar PDs....
more...
weasley
09-27 02:14 PM
Even before USCIS released the data some of the Donors mentioned that there is discrepancy in the FOIA data and core is expect to release the data to everyone once they receive confirmation from USCIS. We believe in IV. USCIS would not have released this data unless IV and thousands of its members have put their efforts on FOIA action item. There allways will be someone like you to complain about IV like this. So nobody cares what your post says.
1. They had to post the 485 pending list sooner than they anticipated because USCIS "one up"ped them by posting the info on their website and hence they were not able to play "God" with that info anymore.
2. They got my ID and IP banned but still I came back.
Ban me all you want but my posts will resonate this forum for ever you corrupt "Core" scumbags.
1. They had to post the 485 pending list sooner than they anticipated because USCIS "one up"ped them by posting the info on their website and hence they were not able to play "God" with that info anymore.
2. They got my ID and IP banned but still I came back.
Ban me all you want but my posts will resonate this forum for ever you corrupt "Core" scumbags.
hair of the human skeleton
atlgc
09-08 01:42 PM
came in march 2000
rest in my signature..
rest in my signature..
more...
skynet2500
09-29 01:30 PM
Can some one advise me which data is correct? whether the correct data is FOIA or USCIS website data? :confused:
If USCIS website data is correct, then the EB-2 cutoff date can not be 01/22/2005 and it should be much more earlier
I agree with this theory. I think Nov visa bulletin would prove this theory furher if the dates don't retrogress. If they do, then all bets are off. I am hoping they won't retrogress to 2004 or sometime before that.
If USCIS website data is correct, then the EB-2 cutoff date can not be 01/22/2005 and it should be much more earlier
I agree with this theory. I think Nov visa bulletin would prove this theory furher if the dates don't retrogress. If they do, then all bets are off. I am hoping they won't retrogress to 2004 or sometime before that.
hot human Skull is pygmy chimpanzees differ in chimpanzees differ in labeled
eb3_nepa
03-19 11:33 PM
Hi everyone,
I see some wonderful research done by some of the core IV people. For the rest of us, who are a bit more clueless, can the source of data be seen. For example these hard numbers that have been provided like x number of EB2 and y amount of EB3 approvals for FY2005 etc. It would be nice to see this data to fully understand exactly how the numbers reduce. Sorry for my ignorance, but i am sure there are more people like me who would like to understand this issue more. Admin did a good job of breaking it down, now if we could just see the numbers to get a clear picture, we could all better understand the problem.
Also it was mentioned on this thread, that People with advanced degrees with 3 years experience in the related field will not be affected. Can someone please shed some light on that?
Another question. What is the next step? I mean currently what can we do? It seems like the Frist/Specter bill has gone from the next best thing to a possible nightmare. :(
I see some wonderful research done by some of the core IV people. For the rest of us, who are a bit more clueless, can the source of data be seen. For example these hard numbers that have been provided like x number of EB2 and y amount of EB3 approvals for FY2005 etc. It would be nice to see this data to fully understand exactly how the numbers reduce. Sorry for my ignorance, but i am sure there are more people like me who would like to understand this issue more. Admin did a good job of breaking it down, now if we could just see the numbers to get a clear picture, we could all better understand the problem.
Also it was mentioned on this thread, that People with advanced degrees with 3 years experience in the related field will not be affected. Can someone please shed some light on that?
Another question. What is the next step? I mean currently what can we do? It seems like the Frist/Specter bill has gone from the next best thing to a possible nightmare. :(
more...
house the human skeleton consists of
ksrk
09-29 06:28 PM
At this time we have created a tool for our members to compare both data provided by USCIS and see its results. The basic difference is as follows:
FOIA / USCIS
EB2C- 4111 / 19,333
EB2I - 9117 / 47,728
EB2M - 26 / 211
EB2P - 82 / 510
EB2R - 1716 / 7,150
EB3C - 1166 / 6,343
EB3I - 8681 / 62,607
EB3M -- 657 / 7,878
EB3P 1624 / 11,563
EB3R - 5779 / 62,840
Thank you for your support
Team IV
The two sets of data are off by an order of magnitude (or more)!!! How incompetent can the USCIS be that they publish two sets of data with such large discrepancies??!!
Seriously, words fail me...maybe this will help express myself better... ^$#&%$(*^%#@!$#@%)!!!
Estimates (just for kicks) by the two methods are as far apart as over 2yrs!
Anyways, it is a start - there is some hazy view now vs. absolute darkness before - certainly kudos to IV's efforts for this.
Good luck to everyone!
FOIA / USCIS
EB2C- 4111 / 19,333
EB2I - 9117 / 47,728
EB2M - 26 / 211
EB2P - 82 / 510
EB2R - 1716 / 7,150
EB3C - 1166 / 6,343
EB3I - 8681 / 62,607
EB3M -- 657 / 7,878
EB3P 1624 / 11,563
EB3R - 5779 / 62,840
Thank you for your support
Team IV
The two sets of data are off by an order of magnitude (or more)!!! How incompetent can the USCIS be that they publish two sets of data with such large discrepancies??!!
Seriously, words fail me...maybe this will help express myself better... ^$#&%$(*^%#@!$#@%)!!!
Estimates (just for kicks) by the two methods are as far apart as over 2yrs!
Anyways, it is a start - there is some hazy view now vs. absolute darkness before - certainly kudos to IV's efforts for this.
Good luck to everyone!
tattoo dec Skeleton, label meone
vactorboy29
12-10 05:19 PM
Should service centers or district offices request proof of �ability to pay� from successor employers in I-140 portability cases, in other words, from the new company/employer to which someone has ported?
Answer: No. The relevant inquiry is whether the new position is in the same or similar occupational classification as the alien�s I-140 employment. It may be appropriate to confirm the legitimacy of a new employer and the job offer through an RFE to the adjustment applicant for relevant information about these issues. In an adjustment setting, public charge is also a relevant inquiry.
Answer: No. The relevant inquiry is whether the new position is in the same or similar occupational classification as the alien�s I-140 employment. It may be appropriate to confirm the legitimacy of a new employer and the job offer through an RFE to the adjustment applicant for relevant information about these issues. In an adjustment setting, public charge is also a relevant inquiry.
more...
pictures human skeleton · labeled
VijKumar
07-20 05:56 PM
Access Problem to Donor forum
I did one time contribution of 100/- Dollars.
Contribution date: 04-13-09, 08:33
Contribution amount: USD 100
I did one time contribution of 100/- Dollars.
Contribution date: 04-13-09, 08:33
Contribution amount: USD 100
dresses HUMAN SKULL DIAGRAM TO LABEL
trueguy
07-23 12:57 PM
IV or its members are not against anybody. All we are trying to do is, to reduce our delays of getting Greencard. All the groups know that EB-3 is in the worst shape and still the cases of 2001 are being processed. Situation is really Frustrating. I hope we can find out some solution to reduce the delay.
Nobody is even talking about EB3-I. How can we get some help from IV on this matter? We must do something.
Nobody is even talking about EB3-I. How can we get some help from IV on this matter? We must do something.
more...
makeup labelled human skeleton
sareesh
09-22 10:53 AM
Guys,
There are around 502,449 cases. This includes everything.
Please see below link.
USCIS: National Processing Volumes and Trends (http://dashboard.uscis.gov/index.cfm?formtype=9&office=5&charttype=2)
we do not have break down by country and category.
Thanks,
SG.
There are around 502,449 cases. This includes everything.
Please see below link.
USCIS: National Processing Volumes and Trends (http://dashboard.uscis.gov/index.cfm?formtype=9&office=5&charttype=2)
we do not have break down by country and category.
Thanks,
SG.
girlfriend human skull bones labeled
sonu_Aug_2002
12-10 06:27 PM
Hi UN,
What happens if your greencard is approved and you leave them after 1 year? Now lets say the employer gets a query from USCIS about the ability to pay and Ur employer decide to leave your name as you are now not working them anymore?
Thanks
What happens if your greencard is approved and you leave them after 1 year? Now lets say the employer gets a query from USCIS about the ability to pay and Ur employer decide to leave your name as you are now not working them anymore?
Thanks
hairstyles Label the Human Skeleton ABCya
reddog
10-24 05:50 PM
My being on H1 has nothing to do with you tryin to bring a Nanny, I am not on a Nanny visa or am I? Can i be your nanny at $65 an hour? jeez.
If you are trying to bring a Nanny to pay her $1000 a month plus airfare and 6 months of vacation and admit her to a local college for education and groundwork with your lawyer to complete the process, go ahead and do it.
I would still say it would be illegal. or you can try to ger borderline legal.
1) If you want to help that person, sponsor her or her childrens education. You are not helping anyone by sponsoring an underpaid worker. How would you feel, if your employer asks you to work for $20K a year just cos you did not have any other opportunity?
2) Sponsor the kid, do some good work. without exploitation.
3) If you want someone to understand your culture, you belong where your culture belongs, right in the very mother-land where you come from, cultures dont get exported out.
4) What you are tryin to do is illegal too, more illegal than the so called illegal you are talking about.
India is a country of a billion people, and you are trying to tell me the story of a downtrodden or a poor soul. and what are you trying to do to help?
Exploit the situation.
If your kid gets sent back from the day-care bcos he sneezes, hire a nanny.
She will take care of the kid at home, and believe me, nannies do moderate house work too, alojng with taking care of the sneezing kid, also does dishes, does the laundry and stuff.
Let me introduce you to a term called PPP(purchasing power parity) google it and see why you should not expect to earn something and spend something else.
Believe me, many of us are in the same situation as you are and everyone of us know of some poor person in india who is deperately in need. And we want a solution too, but the one you want, is wrong..
Oh come on!!!
When you are working on H1 here instead of india because you can earn better and when you are taking away job from american citizen....how can you argue like this?
I have many reasons for bringing nanny here....
1) I want a person who is making 100 $ per month to earn more (atleast 1000 $ per month ...right??)
2) If she would come here, she can support her family and some day her boy can come here for study or something....
3) I want somebody who understands my culture and the way i want to raise my kid.
4) I can get somebody from new jersy but mostly i would get illegal migrant...which i am not comfortable with.
Apart from my personal reasons, one simple economic rule, if you can get cheap labor, you don't want to spend more....that's why cos hiring you instead of American citizen,and outsourcing working great....
I really like your theory of "husband with cribbing wife", but unfortunately i m the wife, who is working 40+ hrs with fortune 500 company and planning to start her own company, whose husband keeps travelling (consulting) as he cann't change his job until GC.
With all odds working against me, I want peace of mind that my kid is in the safe hand, He is not sent back from certified day care only because he is sick...
And if i tell the story of the femal whom I wants to bring here....you would start crying...:-)....
Anyways,
Thanks for all the helpful replies.
If you are trying to bring a Nanny to pay her $1000 a month plus airfare and 6 months of vacation and admit her to a local college for education and groundwork with your lawyer to complete the process, go ahead and do it.
I would still say it would be illegal. or you can try to ger borderline legal.
1) If you want to help that person, sponsor her or her childrens education. You are not helping anyone by sponsoring an underpaid worker. How would you feel, if your employer asks you to work for $20K a year just cos you did not have any other opportunity?
2) Sponsor the kid, do some good work. without exploitation.
3) If you want someone to understand your culture, you belong where your culture belongs, right in the very mother-land where you come from, cultures dont get exported out.
4) What you are tryin to do is illegal too, more illegal than the so called illegal you are talking about.
India is a country of a billion people, and you are trying to tell me the story of a downtrodden or a poor soul. and what are you trying to do to help?
Exploit the situation.
If your kid gets sent back from the day-care bcos he sneezes, hire a nanny.
She will take care of the kid at home, and believe me, nannies do moderate house work too, alojng with taking care of the sneezing kid, also does dishes, does the laundry and stuff.
Let me introduce you to a term called PPP(purchasing power parity) google it and see why you should not expect to earn something and spend something else.
Believe me, many of us are in the same situation as you are and everyone of us know of some poor person in india who is deperately in need. And we want a solution too, but the one you want, is wrong..
Oh come on!!!
When you are working on H1 here instead of india because you can earn better and when you are taking away job from american citizen....how can you argue like this?
I have many reasons for bringing nanny here....
1) I want a person who is making 100 $ per month to earn more (atleast 1000 $ per month ...right??)
2) If she would come here, she can support her family and some day her boy can come here for study or something....
3) I want somebody who understands my culture and the way i want to raise my kid.
4) I can get somebody from new jersy but mostly i would get illegal migrant...which i am not comfortable with.
Apart from my personal reasons, one simple economic rule, if you can get cheap labor, you don't want to spend more....that's why cos hiring you instead of American citizen,and outsourcing working great....
I really like your theory of "husband with cribbing wife", but unfortunately i m the wife, who is working 40+ hrs with fortune 500 company and planning to start her own company, whose husband keeps travelling (consulting) as he cann't change his job until GC.
With all odds working against me, I want peace of mind that my kid is in the safe hand, He is not sent back from certified day care only because he is sick...
And if i tell the story of the femal whom I wants to bring here....you would start crying...:-)....
Anyways,
Thanks for all the helpful replies.
485Mbe4001
09-29 04:10 PM
Please remember that IV was the only organization making an effort to get the data. The data displayed on the USCIS page is also a result of the the efforts made by IV members (my thanks to the members who supported and/or participated the effort).
The PD movement in the next VB will tell us which data is accurate.
Based on the public data, it seems that the data that USCIS gave IV is way off , totally wrong and useless. Given the fact that IV got this "data" just one or two days before the real one was publicly available, it seems IV is totally scammed. I heard IV paid 5000 US dollars for this data? What a big scam from the government!
IV should totally ask for a refund.
The PD movement in the next VB will tell us which data is accurate.
Based on the public data, it seems that the data that USCIS gave IV is way off , totally wrong and useless. Given the fact that IV got this "data" just one or two days before the real one was publicly available, it seems IV is totally scammed. I heard IV paid 5000 US dollars for this data? What a big scam from the government!
IV should totally ask for a refund.
deba
12-09 06:21 PM
Do you have a lawyer? what is his/her take on this? Did you use a company lawyer? If you are denied due to ability to pay issues, presumably everyone else during the same time period/similar jobs are to be denied too. Have you talked to anyone in your old co. who might have applied in the same time frame?
0 comments:
Post a Comment